Since blogs provide a means by which one may vent a little, please indulge me this morning. Lately, the topic of fundamentalism has been on my brain, probably, since Brandon revisited it in his last post. But more than that, this last week I have recalled several conversations I have had with people over the years who have "come out" of fundamental groups and are plagued with an ongoing re-learning process. And I find that to be true, not so much that we need to re-learn the basic historical doctrines but we must re-learn how to learn them and how to hold to them and most importantly how to teach them.
I appreciate humble orthodoxy, if I can use the term orthodoxy here to refer to a basic agreement with the modern church; e.g., deity of Christ, The Trinity, Salvation by grace alone, etc. I know I am assuming a lot here but I think that the three people who might read this blog understand.
In my estimation, fundamentalism does not offer much in the way of humility even though many are orthodox in most areas, however, that may be relative. The way I learned systematic theology was in a very rote, hubristic sort of way; one might argue that it was much like the attitude of the Pharisees of Jesus' day. And for that I am ashamed.
This morning I read a great post over at Parchment and Pen, click here to read it. In this post Michael Patton describes many of his theological positions. He is clearly soteriologically reformed, but the doctrines of grace are not his pets or hobby horses. He makes it clear that this is not something that he normally does but he gets many questions along these lines. What I find compelling is that he ranks each segment of his brief points of theology, he ranks them according to how sure he is of that position. I must add that this sort of humility is rare amongst most fundamentalists and even evangelicals, that said, I greatly appreciate it. For someone to go on record as barely believing in a pre-trib rapture is very transparent, he writes the same for limited atonement.
Oh! I long for a humble approach to theology, one that does not smack of having a corner on the truth, one that teaches Christians rather than validating a doctrinal statement or "my position." Such a humble approach just might encourage Christians to be excited about learning the truth.
Tuesday, May 06, 2008
Humble Reformed Protestantism
Posted by Chris at 1:55 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Hey Chris,
Your comments have made me think of two areas where fundamentalism has caused me heartache. First is within the churches of a certain fellowship that hold to a rigid orthodoxy about things which are not central to our faith. They have taken things which we have the freedom to disagree about and have chosen to divide or separate rather than reside peaceably within the Body. These are often things which have closer ties to tradition than they do to Scripture.
Second, as I move into the chaplaincy, which is a pluralistic environment, I've already been treated (by a small minority) as rigid and non-intellectual. The assumption is that because of my background, I am unwilling to evaluate and either defend or admit weakness in my own theology. I think the expectation is that I will take an "I'm right - you're wrong" stance rather than engage in rational defense. It was a little surprising, and a bit frustrating.
Keith,
Great to read your comment. I have also noticed that many Christians have interesting opinions about certain rigid groups, after getting to know a few of this persuasion, they are surprised about the attitudes and discernment that a few of us have.
Thanks for reading brother.
Keith is alive! Hello Keith and Chris. I enjoyed Patton's post too. It's hard to admit a lack of 100% certainty on some things, and it's even harder if for some reason one is raised believing that anything less than absolute certainty is not of faith. It takes some re-learning to realize that faith is actually the opposite of that old understanding.
When was the last time the three of us were together? Long time--we need a reunion.
Vanhoozer points out that many today wrongly view the Bible through a reductionist lens. I don't see the Apostle's breaking fellowship over eschatological viewpoints as quickly as some do today even though they were chronologically closer to Christ and probably had a more accurate hermeneutic.
"breaking fellowship over eschatological viewpoints" - ha ha! You know I am currently teaching through Revelation with Eli and Josh?
Post a Comment